Today, speaking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a class of timepieces that's normally used for even ten percent of its potential.
What good is it to possess the best, which for him to plunge to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as simple as "drinking a glass of water", when the person has fastened his wrist to the maximum after a dip along with a few strokes, then return instantly to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their main use it is only the fault of old habits at least as much as the introduction of the so-called divers of the modern era that dates back to the center of the previous century.
The incorrigible need to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three decades later, in 1953, Blancpain devised the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces the group can boast, has been tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of their well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famous documentary -film also winner of an Oscar award.
Continuing, I believe that even non-fans will remember well one of the first Rolex Submariner appear several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist turned into a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other with no crown shield shoulders, imitated a bit by everybody.
These are only a couple of the very first cases that reveal - fiction or fact - for over fifty years the media - driven by the watch industry - decided that the diver watches should be the first to personify the concept of man-adventure. Perhaps it is also from that day the manufacturers in regards to describing their versions started to use the term: "appropriate for any event".
The 007 shift, sadly also the mythical "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all of the mechanics of the most well-known spy on earth, and clearly also the opinion whose function was played with the Omega Seamaster for several decades.
But beyond their real use within this massive family whose roots would simply have to deal with "hard even more than steel", today there are also models so bejeweled to dread even once you need to wash the palms.
But a real diver's view has normally always had a whole lot to say technically talking. Let us just mention the features and constructive characteristics of those references.
I've a long standing friend who's an expert diver and who, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100% of his diving watch - like that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures that are breathed at high depths.
A real wrist sub must be able to guarantee the following performances:
Excellent visibility during the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to impact and salt water
Accurate verification of the operation of the device that reports the dive time
An in-depth test of the efficiency of its movement, either mechanical or quartz
But the tests did not end here: today professional diving watches need to adhere to certain rules like the ones described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal usage, what we all know is the greatest, the best sub could be in the end a watchable to provide attributes considerably milder and easier to handle.
I recall this in order to only immerse the surface in maximum security, a timepiece ought to be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (approximately 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but that is not so when it is done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to prevent diving, particularly if ours couldn't even rely to a screw-on crown, better still if protected on the sides by the classic two shoulders.
Along with the security on the watertight status of this submerged timepieces?
Precisely for those who would never use them for specialist purposes the ideal is to have the ability to rely upon a device that visually signals on the dial in the event the crown isn't completely screwed, as well as the watch is therefore in a blatant state of non-security.
Sadly, this really is the principal reason why an abyssal super dive watch might have to be rushed to a service center, prior to seawater entering risks virtually any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, but on digital divers watch very few versions, which honestly I don't understand why.
You might have worn your diving diver's watch on your wrist in order to visit the sea and consequently, after correcting the moment, have read more forgotten to screw the crown tightly. It's by far the most common case.
Suggestion - When you have worn the costume decide on the fly : leave your diver someplace safe or obligatorily make a final but fundamental check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen a little 'of problems related to the time that must satisfy with the water, and also given the necessary advice, I show you that - so far - are for me the best dive watches.
They are not many: I have divided them into two classes. The sequence in which they appear does not signify any position.